Ryzen 9 7940HS vs EPYC 7573X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.89
+128%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Ryzen 9 7940HS by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking38263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.44no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$5250 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2.8 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache768 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million25,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FP8
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 7940HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 7940HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7573X 44.89
+128%
Ryzen 9 7940HS 19.69

EPYC 7573X outperforms Ryzen 9 7940HS by 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7573X 69432
+128%
Ryzen 9 7940HS 30451

EPYC 7573X outperforms Ryzen 9 7940HS by 128% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.89 19.69
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 35 Watt

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7940HS in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Ryzen 9 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 848 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7573X or Ryzen 9 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.