To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs AMD EPYC 7552
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparing EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating | 5 | 18 |
Value for money | 11.43 | 6.21 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | no data |
Release date | 7 August 2019 (3 years old) | 1 April 2021 (1 year old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,025 | no data |
Current price | $4004 (1x MSRP) | $2900 |
Technical specs
EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
Threads | 96 | 64 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.35 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 192 MB (shared) | 48 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
Socket | TR4 | FCLGA4189 |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | no data |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 6 TB |
Max memory channels | 8 | 8 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
EPYC 7552 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352Y by 33% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 73.33 | 55.30 |
Recency | 7 August 2019 | 1 April 2021 |
Boost clock speed | 3350 | 0 |
Base clock speed | 2200 | 0 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 205 Watt |
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7552 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.