EPYC 7773X vs EPYC 7552

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7552
2019
48 cores / 96 threads
33.04

EPYC 7773X outperforms EPYC 7552 by 79% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7552 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.275.22
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Milan-X (2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,025no data
Current price$1739 (0.4x MSRP)$6590

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7552 has 212% better value for money than EPYC 7773X.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7552 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads96128
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache192 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7552 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7552 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7552 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7552 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7552 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7552 33.04
EPYC 7773X 59.15
+79%

EPYC 7773X outperforms EPYC 7552 by 79% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7552 51104
EPYC 7773X 91491
+79%

EPYC 7773X outperforms EPYC 7552 by 79% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.04 59.15
Recency 7 August 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 48 64
Threads 96 128
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7552 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7552 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7552
EPYC 7552
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 42 votes

Rate EPYC 7552 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7552 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.