A4-9120C vs EPYC 7551P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551P
2017, $2,100
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
21.77
+4169%

EPYC 7551P outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 4169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3213176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.46no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency5.103.59
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)6 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7551P and A4-9120C: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads642
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplier2016
L1 cache96K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2124.5 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551P and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551P and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551P and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551P and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551P and A4-9120C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7551P 21.77
+4169%
A4-9120C 0.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7551P 38111
+4301%
Samples: 86
A4-9120C 866
Samples: 35

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.77 0.51
Recency 29 June 2017 6 January 2019
Physical cores 32 2
Threads 64 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7551P has a 4169% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2900% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7551P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-9120C in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7551P is a server/workstation processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 89 votes

Rate EPYC 7551P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 102 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7551P and A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.