Xeon Gold 6129 vs EPYC 7551P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 321 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.46 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.10 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | no data |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 April 2018 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 7551P and Xeon Gold 6129: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 22 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7551P and Xeon Gold 6129 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | TR4 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Gold 6129. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
EPYC 7551P and Xeon Gold 6129 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Gold 6129 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Gold 6129. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Gold 6129.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2017 | 1 April 2018 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 16 |
| Threads | 64 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 120 Watt |
EPYC 7551P has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Xeon Gold 6129, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7551P and Intel Xeon Gold 6129. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
