A4-9120C vs EPYC 7351P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7351P outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 2732% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 546 | 3079 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.09 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 3.52 | 3.52 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $750 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7351P and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 24 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 1200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7351P and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | TR4 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and A4-9120C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | 14.936 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and A4-9120C.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.16 | 0.50 |
| Recency | 29 June 2017 | 6 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 6 Watt |
EPYC 7351P has a 2732% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2733.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-9120C in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
