Xeon Platinum 8362 vs EPYC 7551

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
14.52
+147%
Xeon Platinum 8362
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 265 Watt
5.89

EPYC 7551 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4691049
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.081.95
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400no data
Current price$252 (0.1x MSRP)$3719

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7551 has 827% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8362.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt265 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551 14.52
+147%
Xeon Platinum 8362 5.89

EPYC 7551 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7551 22463
+147%
Xeon Platinum 8362 9107

EPYC 7551 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by 147% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.52 5.89
Recency 29 June 2017 6 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 265 Watt

The EPYC 7551 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8362 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551 and Xeon Platinum 8362, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
Intel Xeon Platinum 8362
Xeon Platinum 8362

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8362 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551 or Xeon Platinum 8362, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.