A6-4400M vs EPYC 7551

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7551
2017
32 cores / 64 threads
14.52
+2134%

EPYC 7551 outperforms A6-4400M by a whopping 2134% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551 and A6-4400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4502627
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.38no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date29 June 2017 (6 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400no data
Current price$252 (0.1x MSRP)$95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551 and A6-4400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads642
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551 and A6-4400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551 and A6-4400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551 and A6-4400M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551 and A6-4400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelunknown
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7520G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551 and A6-4400M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551 14.52
+2134%
A6-4400M 0.65

EPYC 7551 outperforms A6-4400M by 2134% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7551 22463
+2131%
A6-4400M 1007

EPYC 7551 outperforms A6-4400M by 2131% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7551 925
+189%
A6-4400M 320

EPYC 7551 outperforms A6-4400M by 189% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7551 5548
+1263%
A6-4400M 407

EPYC 7551 outperforms A6-4400M by 1263% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.52 0.65
Recency 29 June 2017 15 May 2012
Physical cores 32 2
Threads 64 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

The EPYC 7551 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4400M in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7551 is a server/workstation processor while A6-4400M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551 and A6-4400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 169 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551 or A6-4400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.