A12-9800 vs EPYC 7551

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
15.91
+583%

EPYC 7551 outperforms A12-9800 by a whopping 583% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551 and A12-9800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4361785
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.261.79
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400$139

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A12-9800 has 42% better value for money than EPYC 7551.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551 and A12-9800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads644
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551 and A12-9800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551 and A12-9800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551 and A12-9800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551 and A12-9800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7551 and A12-9800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7551 and A12-9800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551 and A12-9800.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551 15.91
+583%
A12-9800 2.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7551 24534
+582%
A12-9800 3597

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7551 925
+31.2%
A12-9800 705

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7551 5548
+227%
A12-9800 1697

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.91 2.33
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7551 has a 582.8% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A12-9800, on the other hand, has 176.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7551 is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9800 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7551 is a server/workstation processor while A12-9800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551 and A12-9800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
AMD A12-9800
A12-9800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 195 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551 or A12-9800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.