EPYC 7702 vs EPYC 7542

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7542
2019
32 cores / 64 threads
30.80
EPYC 7702
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.19
+46.7%

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7542 by 47% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7542 and EPYC 7702 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money13.163.08
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400$6,450
Current price$2009 (0.6x MSRP)$8948 (1.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7542 has 327% better value for money than EPYC 7702.

Technical specs

EPYC 7542 and EPYC 7702 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.35 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7542 and EPYC 7702 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3TR4
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7542 and EPYC 7702. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7542 and EPYC 7702 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7542 and EPYC 7702. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7542 30.80
EPYC 7702 45.19
+46.7%

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7542 by 47% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7542 47626
EPYC 7702 69872
+46.7%

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7542 by 47% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7542 1002
EPYC 7702 1172
+17%

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7542 by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7542 8231
EPYC 7702 11524
+40%

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7542 by 40% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 30.80 45.19
Physical cores 32 64
Threads 64 128
Cost $3400 $6450
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 200 Watt

The EPYC 7702 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7542 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7542 and EPYC 7702, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7542
EPYC 7542
AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7542 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7542 or EPYC 7702, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.