A10-7800 vs EPYC 7542

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7542
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
29.41
+1300%

EPYC 7542 outperforms A10-7800 by a whopping 1300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7542 and A10-7800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1601909
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.21no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency11.922.95
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)31 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7542 and A10-7800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads644
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache2 MB256 KB
L2 cache16 MB4096 KB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7542 and A10-7800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSP3FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7542 and A10-7800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7542 and A10-7800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7542 and A10-7800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3-2133
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Number of pipelinesno data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7542 and A10-7800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7542 and A10-7800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7542 and A10-7800.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7542 29.41
+1300%
A10-7800 2.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7542 45003
+1302%
A10-7800 3209

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7542 1022
+135%
A10-7800 434

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7542 8423
+678%
A10-7800 1083

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.41 2.10
Recency 7 August 2019 31 July 2014
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7542 has a 1300.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

A10-7800, on the other hand, has 246.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7542 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7800 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7542 is a server/workstation processor while A10-7800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7542 and A10-7800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7542
EPYC 7542
AMD A10-7800
A10-7800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8 votes

Rate EPYC 7542 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 294 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7542 or A10-7800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.