Ryzen 5 1600AF vs EPYC 7452

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking145not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.93no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)11 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,025no data
Current price$1470 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads6412
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm12 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 11 October 2019
Physical cores 32 6
Threads 64 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7452 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7452 and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7452
EPYC 7452
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 70 votes

Rate EPYC 7452 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 231 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7452 or Ryzen 5 1600AF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.