Duron 1200 vs EPYC 7451
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 403 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.78 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Duron |
| Power efficiency | 8.56 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 20 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 30 January 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,400 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 23 | 12 |
| L1 cache | 2.25 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 64 KB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 105.68 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 19200 Million | 25 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | TR4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 54.7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2017 | 30 January 2002 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 1 |
| Threads | 48 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 54 Watt |
EPYC 7451 has an age advantage of 15 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
Duron 1200, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7451 is a server/workstation processor while Duron 1200 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Duron 1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
