Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs EPYC 7451

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.28
+269%
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
4.41

EPYC 7451 outperforms Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4041332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.5611.92
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Dali (2020)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.28
+269%
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE 4.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7451 25863
+269%
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE 7006

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.28 4.41
Recency 29 June 2017 21 July 2020
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7451 has a 269.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 414.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7451 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 41 vote

Rate Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.