Processor N200 vs EPYC 7413

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7413
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
32.47
+1968%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 6 Watt
1.57

EPYC 7413 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 1968% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7413 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1122025
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.68no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Alder Lake-N
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,825no data
Current price$1485 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7413 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads4844 x 3.7  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed2.65 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7413 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7413 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

EPYC 7413 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7413 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7413 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7413 and Processor N200.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1289

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.47 1.57
Recency 15 March 2021 3 January 2023
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 6 Watt

The EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7413 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7413 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 111 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7413 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.