Processor U300 vs EPYC 7401

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401 and Processor U300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking106not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.59no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency19.37no data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads486
Base clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data55 MHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache2.25 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7401 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and Processor U300.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2017 4 January 2023
Physical cores 24 5
Threads 48 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7401 has 380% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Processor U300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7401 and Processor U300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401 and Processor U300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
Intel Processor U300
Processor U300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401 or Processor U300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.