D-1513N vs EPYC 7401

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401 and D-1513N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking88not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.89no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon D
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850$192
Current price$1502 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and D-1513N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads488
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2246.24 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and D-1513N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and D-1513N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

EPYC 7401 and D-1513N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and D-1513N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and D-1513N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s29.861 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and D-1513N.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 8
Cost $1850 $192
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7401 and D-1513N. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401 and D-1513N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
Intel D-1513N
D-1513N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate D-1513N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401 or D-1513N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.