Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs EPYC 73F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.81
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
49.14
+64.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms EPYC 73F3 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.0816.98
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Chagall PRO (2022)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)8 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,521no data
Current price$6522 (1.9x MSRP)$2799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 451% better value for money than EPYC 73F3.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 73F3 29.81
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 49.14
+64.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms EPYC 73F3 by 65% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 73F3 46103
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 76009
+64.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms EPYC 73F3 by 65% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.81 49.14
Recency 15 March 2021 8 March 2022
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 73F3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 73F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 73F3 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.