Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs EPYC 7513

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
47.63
+27.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms EPYC 7513 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.66no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency17.6616.10
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Chagall PRO (2022)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)8 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,840no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.65 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier2636
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7513 37.32
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 47.63
+27.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7513 59285
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 75654
+27.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.32 47.63
Recency 15 March 2021 8 March 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7513 has 40% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, on the other hand, has a 27.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7513 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7513 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7513 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.