Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs EPYC 7763

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
54.25
+11.8%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
48.53

EPYC 7763 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.13no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency18.0016.10
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Chagall PRO (2022)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)8 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,890no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2.45 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier24.536
L1 cache4 MB2 MB
L2 cache32 MB16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7763 54.25
+11.8%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 48.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7763 84557
+11.8%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 75654

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7763 1344
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 2053
+52.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7763 10361
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 16736
+61.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.25 48.53
Recency 12 January 2021 8 March 2022
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64

EPYC 7763 has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1197 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7763 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.