EPYC 7F52 vs EPYC 7371

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
19.38
EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
26.01
+34.2%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms EPYC 7371 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking292187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.385.46
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.7915.88
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date16 November 2018 (6 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550$3,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7F52 has 1% better value for money than EPYC 7371.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier3135
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F52 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F52.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 19.38
EPYC 7F52 26.01
+34.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7371 30782
EPYC 7F52 41322
+34.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.38 26.01
Recency 16 November 2018 14 April 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 155 Watt

EPYC 7F52 has a 34.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 9.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7371 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or EPYC 7F52, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.