Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs EPYC 7352

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
25.41
+29.1%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68

EPYC 7352 outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking198290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.29no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency15.5134.49
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)12 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 25.41
+29.1%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7352 40370
+29.2%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.41 19.68
Recency 7 August 2019 25 July 2024
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 54 Watt

EPYC 7352 has a 29.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 187% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7352 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.