Atom N475 vs EPYC 7351P
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7351P and Atom N475 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 397 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.07 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 8.99 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 20 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 June 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $750 | $75 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7351P and Atom N475 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19200 Million | 123 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7351P and Atom N475 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W, 170 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and Atom N475. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
EPYC 7351P and Atom N475 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and Atom N475 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and Atom N475. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 3150 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and Atom N475.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2017 | 1 June 2010 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 6 Watt |
EPYC 7351P has an age advantage of 7 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Atom N475, on the other hand, has 2483.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7351P and Atom N475. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while Atom N475 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and Atom N475, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
