A6-9220e vs EPYC 7351P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
14.18
+2478%

EPYC 7351P outperforms A6-9220e by a whopping 2478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5483040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.10no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency3.523.86
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)1 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and A6-9220e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads322
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache96K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and A6-9220e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and A6-9220e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and A6-9220e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and A6-9220e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and A6-9220e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7351P 14.18
+2478%
A6-9220e 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 24871
+2499%
Samples: 14
A6-9220e 957
Samples: 82

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.18 0.55
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7351P has a 2478.2% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9220e, on the other hand, has 2733.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-9220e in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while A6-9220e is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 323 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7351P and A6-9220e, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.