Xeon Gold 6130H vs EPYC 7343
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7343 outperforms Xeon Gold 6130H by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 175 | 231 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.98 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
Power efficiency | 13.66 | 16.89 |
Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | no data |
Release date | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 July 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,565 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 32 | 32 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 32 | no data |
L1 cache | 1 MB | no data |
L2 cache | 8 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 22 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 14 nm |
Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | SP3 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 768 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 27.42 | 22.31 |
Recency | 12 January 2021 | 1 July 2018 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC 7343 has a 22.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Gold 6130H, on the other hand, has 52% lower power consumption.
The EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6130H in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 6130H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.