Ryzen 5 7535HS vs EPYC 7343

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
28.46
+137%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7343 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking174667
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.20no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency13.6631.32
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,565no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7343 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.55 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+6 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7343 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FP7
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7343 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7343 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7343 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7343 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7343 28.46
+137%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 12.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7343 43561
+137%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18390

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7343 1533
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1760
+14.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7343 11934
+72.1%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6934

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.46 12.02
Recency 12 January 2021 4 January 2023
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7343 has a 136.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 442.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7535HS in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7343 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7343 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1337 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7343 or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.