EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7302P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads
21.09
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.03
+114%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 114% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money18.2222.31
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data
Current price$792 (1x MSRP)$1970

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 22% better value for money than EPYC 7302P.

Technical specs

EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads32128
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302P 21.09
EPYC 7H12 45.03
+114%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 114% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7302P 32612
EPYC 7H12 69633
+114%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 114% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 21.09 45.03
Recency 7 August 2019 18 September 2019
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 32 128
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7302P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 26 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.