EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 7302P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.17
EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
46.97
+122%

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7302P by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7662 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.84no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data
Current price$864 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads32128
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)4 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)32 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302P 21.17
EPYC 7662 46.97
+122%

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7302P 32740
EPYC 7662 72653
+122%

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 122% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.17 46.97
Recency 7 August 2019 19 February 2020
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 32 128
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 225 Watt

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7302P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302P and EPYC 7662, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P
AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302P or EPYC 7662, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.