Celeron 5305U vs EPYC 7302
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7302 outperforms Celeron 5305U by a whopping 2449% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 375 | 2915 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.36 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.21 | 2.11 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) | 1 April 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $978 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (per die) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 4x 74 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 15,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | FCBGA1528 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors |
| Max video memory | no data | 32 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 900 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302 and Celeron 5305U.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.12 | 0.75 |
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 1 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7302 has a 2449.3% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 5305U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 933.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7302 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 5305U in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7302 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 5305U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
