Ryzen 3 4300G vs EPYC 7301

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
9.47
+38.9%
Ryzen 3 4300G
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.82

EPYC 7301 outperforms Ryzen 3 4300G by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 3 4300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8041021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.96no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency5.259.89
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 3 4300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier2238
L1 cache96K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm2156 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 3 4300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 3 4300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 3 4300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 3 4300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 3 4300G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.47
+38.9%
Ryzen 3 4300G 6.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
+39%
Ryzen 3 4300G 10788

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.47 6.82
Recency 29 June 2017 21 July 2020
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7301 has a 38.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen 3 4300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 161.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7301 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 4300G in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 4300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 3 4300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
Ryzen 3 4300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 166 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or Ryzen 3 4300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.