Apple M2 vs EPYC 7301

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
9.47
+0.3%
Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.44

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking804807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.96no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency5.2544.48
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)no data
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.48 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache96K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)20 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million20000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Apple M2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Apple M2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Apple M2.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.47
+0.3%
Apple M2 9.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
+0.4%
Apple M2 14933

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.47 9.44
Recency 29 June 2017 10 June 2022
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 20 Watt

EPYC 7301 has a 0.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 750% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7301 and Apple M2.

Be aware that EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and Apple M2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
Apple M2
M2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 598 votes

Rate Apple M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or Apple M2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.