Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs EPYC 7252

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7252
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
12.55
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
54.11
+331%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms EPYC 7252 by a whopping 331% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7252 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking61026
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.595.36
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)14 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$475$5,500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7252 has 116% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7252 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier3127
L1 cache512 KB4 MB
L2 cache4 MB32 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million38740 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7252 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7252 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7252 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7252 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7252 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7252 12.55
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 54.11
+331%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7252 19411
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83697
+331%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.55 54.11
Recency 7 August 2019 14 June 2020
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 128
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7252 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has a 331.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7252 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7252 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7252
EPYC 7252
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 825 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7252 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.