EPYC 7451 vs E2-9010

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.71
EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.90
+2280%

EPYC 7451 outperforms E2-9010 by a whopping 2280% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and EPYC 7451 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2708403
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.78
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.328.56
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)20 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and EPYC 7451 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplierno data23
L1 cacheno data2.25 MB
L2 cache2048 KB12 MB
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million19200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and EPYC 7451 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 7451. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 7451 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 7451. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channels18
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and EPYC 7451 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 7451 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and EPYC 7451.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9010 0.71
EPYC 7451 16.90
+2280%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9010 1093
EPYC 7451 25863
+2266%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 16.90
Recency 1 June 2016 20 June 2017
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 180 Watt

E2-9010 has 1700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7451, on the other hand, has a 2280.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9010 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-9010 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7451 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and EPYC 7451, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 29 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9010 or EPYC 7451, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.