Celeron M 370 vs E2-9010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2706not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeCeleron M
Power efficiency4.32no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

E2-9010 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and Celeron M 370 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and Celeron M 370 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and Celeron M 370.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E2-9010 37.14
+226%
Celeron M 370 121

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 21 Watt

E2-9010 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 110% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-9010 and Celeron M 370. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 29 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9010 or Celeron M 370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.