Celeron M 370 vs A6-9220
General info
Comparing A6-9220 and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2459 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (7 years ago) | no data |
| Current price | $411 | $130 |
Technical specs
A6-9220 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on A6-9220 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10-15 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization, | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
A6-9220 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220 and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Celeron M 370 outperforms A6-9220 by 337% in wPrime 32.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 21 Watt |
We couldn't decide between A6-9220 and Celeron M 370. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
