A9-9420e vs E2-9010

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

E2-9010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads
0.71
+1.4%

E2-9010 outperforms A9-9420e by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and A9-9420e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25732575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 June 2016 (7 years ago)1 June 2018 (5 years ago)
Current price$561 $380

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHzno data
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,
AES-NI1no data
FMAFMA4no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866DDR4
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and A9-9420e integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and A9-9420e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and A9-9420e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9010 0.71
+1.4%
A9-9420e 0.70

E2-9010 outperforms A9-9420e by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-9010 1093
+0.4%
A9-9420e 1089

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-9010 91
A9-9420e 97
+6.6%

A9-9420e outperforms E2-9010 by 7% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.70
Integrated graphics card 1.34
Recency 1 June 2016 1 June 2018

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-9010 and A9-9420e.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and A9-9420e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 26 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 134 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9010 or A9-9420e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.