C-60 vs E2-6110
Primary details
Comparing E2-6110 and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2658 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD E-Series | AMD C-Series |
Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | Ontario (2010−2012) |
Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-6110 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | no data | 75 mm2 |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-6110 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FT3b | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-6110 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-6110 and C-60 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-6110 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR3 Single-channel |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6290 |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-6110 and C-60 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-6110 and C-60 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-6110 and C-60.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 29 April 2014 | 22 August 2011 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 9 Watt |
E2-6110 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
C-60, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E2-6110 and C-60. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-6110 and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.