Ryzen Embedded V2516 vs E2-3800

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3800
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.73
Ryzen Embedded V2516
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.19
+1022%

Ryzen Embedded V2516 outperforms E2-3800 by a whopping 1022% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2693928
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency4.6177.51
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache2048 KB3 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size107 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels14
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.269 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8280AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3800 0.73
Ryzen Embedded V2516 8.19
+1022%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3800 1152
Ryzen Embedded V2516 13016
+1030%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 8.19
Recency 23 May 2013 10 November 2020
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Ryzen Embedded V2516 has a 1021.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Embedded V2516 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3800 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-3800 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded V2516 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3800 and Ryzen Embedded V2516, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3800
E2-3800
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516
Ryzen Embedded V2516

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 104 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2516 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3800 or Ryzen Embedded V2516, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.