Ryzen 7 5700G vs E2-3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3800
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.74
Ryzen 7 5700G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.88
+2046%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by a whopping 2046% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2574402
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.52
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Cezanne (Zen 3)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$359
Current price$107 $1050 (2.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size107 mm2AM4 (1331) mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8280AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3800 0.74
Ryzen 7 5700G 15.88
+2046%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 2046% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-3800 1148
Ryzen 7 5700G 24563
+2040%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 2040% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E2-3800 138
Ryzen 7 5700G 1983
+1337%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 1337% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E2-3800 395
Ryzen 7 5700G 8738
+2112%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 2112% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E2-3800 2295
Ryzen 7 5700G 6196
+170%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 170% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-3800 3575
Ryzen 7 5700G 38827
+986%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 986% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E2-3800 42.64
Ryzen 7 5700G 4.33
+885%

E2-3800 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 885% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E2-3800 1
Ryzen 7 5700G 24
+1742%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 1742% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-3800 103
Ryzen 7 5700G 2107
+1946%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 1946% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-3800 28
Ryzen 7 5700G 243
+766%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 766% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E2-3800 0.32
Ryzen 7 5700G 2.86
+794%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 794% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-3800 0.8
Ryzen 7 5700G 10.5
+1229%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 1229% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-3800 963
Ryzen 7 5700G 7681
+698%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 698% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-3800 8
Ryzen 7 5700G 123
+1545%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 1545% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-3800 36
Ryzen 7 5700G 274
+665%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms E2-3800 by 665% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 15.88
Integrated graphics card 0.67 9.08
Recency 23 May 2013 13 April 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 5700G is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3800 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-3800 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 5700G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3800 and Ryzen 7 5700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3800
E2-3800
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Ryzen 7 5700G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 70 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3275 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3800 or Ryzen 7 5700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.