Athlon 64 3800+ vs E2-3000M

Place in the ranking	2987	3006
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	AMD E-Series	no data
Power efficiency	1.14	0.43
Architecture codename	Llano (2011−2012)	Venice (2004−2005)
Release date	20 December 2011 (13 years ago)	June 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$160

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Athlon 64 3800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	1.8 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	130 nm
Die size	228 mm²	230 mm²
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	70 °C
Number of transistors	1,178 million	227 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Athlon 64 3800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FS1	939
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Athlon 64 3800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions

SSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380G

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Athlon 64 3800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Athlon 64 3800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon HD 6380G

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3000M 0.42
+5%

Athlon 64 3800+ 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
+5.2%

Athlon 64 3800+ 635

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.42	0.40
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	89 Watt

E2-3000M has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-3000M and Athlon 64 3800+.

Be aware that E2-3000M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 3800+ is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000M and Athlon 64 3800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.