Ryzen 9 3900X vs E2-3000

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.82
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiencyno data18.51
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache1024 KB6 MB
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280-
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12-
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000 726
Ryzen 9 3900X 32619
+4393%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 105 Watt

E2-3000 has 600% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-3000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000
E2-3000
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5124 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000 or Ryzen 9 3900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.