Ryzen 7 8700F vs E2-3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Phoenix
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Current price$202 $269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size246 mm2178 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4no data
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280N/A
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-3000 726
Ryzen 7 8700F 31170
+4193%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms E2-3000 by 4193% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 1 April 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-3000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000
E2-3000
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 21 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000 or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.