Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs E2-2000
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS outperforms E2-2000 by a whopping 5371% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3416 | 533 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.66 | 23.11 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 6 January 2013 (13 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-2000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.75 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on E2-2000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-2000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-2000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-2000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7340 | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-2000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.28 | 15.32 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.37 | 16.44 |
| Recency | 6 January 2013 | 16 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 28 Watt |
E2-2000 has 55.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, on the other hand, has a 5371.4% higher aggregate performance score, 4343.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-2000 in performance tests.
Be aware that E2-2000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
