Ryzen 5 3400G vs E1-7010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1108
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data8.49
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-7010 593
Ryzen 5 3400G 9252
+1460%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-7010 127
Ryzen 5 3400G 1133
+792%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-7010 218
Ryzen 5 3400G 3631
+1566%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2015 12 June 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

E1-7010 has 550% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3400G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2114 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or Ryzen 5 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.