EPYC 4344P vs E1-7010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated239
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.19
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data31.61
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors930 Million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-7010 593
EPYC 4344P 34474
+5713%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2015 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

E1-7010 has 550% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4344P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4344P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and EPYC 4344P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
AMD EPYC 4344P
EPYC 4344P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4344P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or EPYC 4344P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.