A8-3800 vs E1-6010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and A8-3800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data1.88
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)30 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and A8-3800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2228 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and A8-3800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3bFM1
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and A8-3800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and A8-3800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and A8-3800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 6550D
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and A8-3800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and A8-3800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and A8-3800.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-6010 534
A8-3800 2049
+284%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-6010 128
A8-3800 291
+127%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-6010 219
A8-3800 889
+306%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 30 June 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

E1-6010 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

A8-3800, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between E1-6010 and A8-3800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-6010 is a notebook processor while A8-3800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and A8-3800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-6010
E1-6010
AMD A8-3800
A8-3800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 562 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 70 votes

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or A8-3800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.