EPYC 7551P vs E1-1500

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.02
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data12.62
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date6 January 2013 (11 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.48 GHz3 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallTR4
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-1500 398
EPYC 7551P 38126
+9479%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-1500 108
EPYC 7551P 931
+762%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-1500 191
EPYC 7551P 6192
+3142%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2013 29 June 2017
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 180 Watt

E1-1500 has 900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7551P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that E1-1500 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7551P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1500 and EPYC 7551P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1500
E1-1500
AMD EPYC 7551P
EPYC 7551P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 161 vote

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 78 votes

Rate EPYC 7551P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1500 or EPYC 7551P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.