EPYC 7251 vs E1-1500
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7251 outperforms E1-1500 by a whopping 3777% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3490 | 1051 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.94 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD E-Series | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.52 | 3.00 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 6 January 2013 (13 years ago) | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $574 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of E1-1500 and EPYC 7251: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.48 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on E1-1500 and EPYC 7251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1500 and EPYC 7251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1500 and EPYC 7251 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1500 and EPYC 7251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 153.652 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7310 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-1500 and EPYC 7251.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.22 | 8.53 |
| Recency | 6 January 2013 | 29 June 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 120 Watt |
E1-1500 has 567% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7251, on the other hand, has a 3777% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7251 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E1-1500 in performance tests.
Note that E1-1500 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7251 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
