Celeron 6305 vs E1-1500

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-1500 and Celeron 6305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiencyno data8.24
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Tiger Lake-U (2020)
Release date6 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-1500 and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.48 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography40 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-1500 and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1500 and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

E1-1500 and Celeron 6305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1500 and Celeron 6305 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1500 and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7310Intel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-1500 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by E1-1500 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-1500 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-1500 398
Celeron 6305 2080
+423%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-1500 108
Celeron 6305 750
+594%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-1500 191
Celeron 6305 1264
+562%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2013 1 September 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 6305 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E1-1500 and Celeron 6305. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that E1-1500 is a desktop processor while Celeron 6305 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1500 and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1500
E1-1500
Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 160 votes

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 147 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1500 or Celeron 6305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.