Atom C3508 vs E1-1500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-1500 and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Atom
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date6 January 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price$84 no data

Detailed specifications

E1-1500 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.48 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E1-1500 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1500 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NIno data+
PowerNow+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

E1-1500 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1500 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1500 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-1500 and Atom C3508.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E1-1500 398
Atom C3508 1796
+351%

Atom C3508 outperforms E1-1500 by 351% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2013 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 11 Watt

We couldn't decide between E1-1500 and Atom C3508. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that E1-1500 is a desktop processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1500 and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1500
E1-1500
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 158 votes

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1500 or Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.